|
The events at Bristol Royal Infirmary
between 1984 and 1995 were described as a 'Greek Tragedy' by
Professor Ian Kennedy, who chaired the public inquiry into the deaths
of babies and young children at the hospital.
Since then, parents and doctors have
been working together to improve communication between the medical
profession and patients. Sir Ian's Bristol Royal Infirmary Public
Inquiry Report produced a list of almost 200 specific recommendation
with the aim of improving paediatric cardiac services.
Although only ten of those
recommendations were directed solely at improving communication
between doctors and patients, much of the report's thrust was that
increased respect, trust, honesty and openness on both sides must be
the way forward.
Parents of children who died at
Bristol formed action groups, initially to campaign for a public
inquiry. After this concluded, they decided to take on boards lessons
from the Bristol report and put them in place themselves.
Maria Shortis lost a daughter in
Bristol an was one of the most prominent campaigners for a public
inquiry. She was on the founding members of the charity Constructive
Dialogue for Clinical Accountability, which has been piloting training
sessions at health departments around the country with funding from
the Health Department. So far, London's Greta Ormond Street, Liverpool's
Alder Hey and Southampton General hospitals have benefited form the training
sessions developed by Mrs Shortis. She says communication should be
based on a triangle model, with the child at the apex and healthcare professionals
and parents at the two bottom corners. She says it is important for
information to flow along the bottom of the triangle, between doctors
and parents, as well as upwards to the child. At the workshops,
doctors, nurses, hospital mangers and parents portray each other in
role play.
Mrs Shortis says: "This gets both
parents and healthcare professionals to think about their
communication, and it is enormously useful to think because they can
get inside other people's feelings. One of the situations we used was
patients leaving a GP consultation where they were told their child
was okay, and then we moved on to a situation where the child was
blue-lighted into hospital. Surgeons played the roles of the patients
and it made them think.
"Too often doctors simply don't
have time to look into the background of a case because they are too
busy making a diagnosis. It is important that they have time to look
at the bigger picture."
Maintain Relationships
Mrs Shortis and her team went into
the hospitals under the banner of Parents as Educators, a scheme where
families were encouraged to take an active part in their children's
education. She says this allowed hospital staff to speak more openly.
"Many doctors and other staff have told us they felt they could
not communicate because of the hierarchical situation in their
hospital. Because parents were there, it meant the doctors were aware
of the reality of what they were doing. The healthcare professionals
said it was of great value to hear what parents thought, without
the situation being confrontational." Mrs
Shortis believes the most difficult thing for doctors to maintain is a
good relationship with patients' parents when something goes wrong.
She says: "Doctors have to look at how to maintain that
relationship with the family but keep being honest at the same time." Both
staff and parents believe the exercises have been a great success and
they are planning to run similar workshops at other cardiac centres. Mrs
Shortis says: "It is all about raising awareness and getting
people to realise their own strength and communication skills. If we
can take people out of their intensive working environment and give
them a place where they can laugh and think - and even cry if they
want to- that can only help." Alder
Hey Children's Hospital care group manager Paul Hetherington says the
two workshops held at the hospital were so successful that it is
looking at running similar schemes for other specialities. He
says: "I can't stress too much how useful this was. It gave us
the opportunity to take time out and think about how we deal with
patients and their parents. We are doing things on a day-to-day basis
but it is often difficult to get the parents' view because the issues
are so complex. Speaking to bereaved parents gave us an insight into
how they viewed their child's treatment. They were all enthused." Great
Ormond Street professor of paediatric cardiac morphology Robert
Anderson, who is also president of the British Paediatric Association,
described the Bristol inquiry as a 'wake up call'. As
long ago as 1999 he took up the task of establishing a dialogue with
parents, having recognised that, in some cases, the trust essential
for good relationships between doctors and parents had been lost.
Professor Anderson admitted that at the time that some of his
colleagues had reservation but says his actions were vindicated by
subsequent event. Along with
representatives from the Children's Heart Federation, Constructive
Dialogue for Clinical Accountability, and the Paediatric Cardiac
Nurses Association he set up a working party to draw up guidelines on
relationships between paediatric cardiac units and families. The
result, Children's Heart Services - a Guide to Care Standards, was
published this month. The Health Department is currently reviewing its
paediatric and congenital cardiac service and the new guidelines are
expected to feed into that. Advice
to Staff The government has
welcomed this spirit of partnership. National clinical director for
children Professor Al Aynsley-Green says it shows what can be achieved
when doctors and parents work together. He intends to use the same
approach as he develops the Children's National Service Framework. The
guidance gives advice to staff working in paediatric units and to
parents all the way along their child's treatment pathway - diagnosis,
awaiting treatment, the operation, post-operative care and discharge
to continuing care. It includes
advice on consenting to surgery, transferring to adult services, and
bereavement. It also looks at how communication can be improved by
cutting jargon and ensuring parents understand what they are told. The
working party discussed the importance of doctors telling families the
true position, no matter how difficult that might be for them to
accept, to avoid accusations of paternalism and protectionism. Professor
Anderson says: "We believe that these guidelines will help build
an honest and trusting relationship between the two parties, essential
for optimising the diagnosis and treatment of children in our care.
They will do this by providing parents with accurate, realistic and
understandable information about their child's condition at all
times." Attitude Change Children's
Heart Foundation chairman John Spall, who was on the working party,
says he has been pleased with the 'refreshing' attitude of the doctors
who joined him on the working party. He says: "We won't be on the
road to Damascus overnight but we are definitely heading in the right
direction. Changing the culture is always going to take time and there
remains the question of funding. The idea of a cardiologist seeing 30
sets of parents in two and a half hours is nonsense, so we shall be
pressing the government for more funding." Mr
Spall says the guidance was not designed to follow the public
inquiry's recommendations to the letter, but it takes into account the
spirit of Sir Ian's advice. Sir
Ian says in his conclusion to the public inquiry report:
"Patients in their journey through the healthcare system are
entitled to be treated with respect and honesty and to be involved,
wherever possible, in decisions about their care." Mr
Spall says: "We did not go through the Bristol recommendations on
a 'tick box' basis. We started with a clean sheet of paper and,
although we did not agree with everything the doctors said and they
didn't agree with everything I said, I was pleasantly surprised with
everyone's attitude." The
guidance has been sent to cardiac centres around the country. The
intention is that parents will be given a copy of it as soon as
practicable following the diagnosis of their child's condition. Mrs
Shortis says: "Hopefully we can bring something positive out of
this tragedy. I lost my daughter 16 years ago and to see something
worthwhile put into place has been marvellous."
|